JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

The oscilloscope image tracing below is from a tape recording that was edited. The activity is evinced at the point where the tracing is flat.

ATTENTION:In 1992 an explicit appeal was lodged at Bow County Court. Within days the managers / controllers of the group that Andrew Yiannides got to know as *Litigants In Person Society* -LIPS crowd / mob- we refer to in our pages, contacted him. Later in the year they were informed that an order putting an end to the attempts to deny and obstruct justice to him [ *Link to a page where we publish brief details & evidence] had been secured. In 1995 they were informed that submissions to the leader of the opposition, led to an appropriate response & the issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM was officially acknowledged, by the opposition. In 1997 an application to the ECoHR hinged on the right to tape-record proceedings at court for unadulterated records of hearings. NOT ONE of the members of the group bothered to act as had been expected of 'victims' of the legal circles - as all had been asserting-. In 2003, as a result of and fraudulent / deceitful activities by one and all of the allegedly concerned fraudsters, we had no choice but to publish evidence relative to the their EVIL ACTIVITIES.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

VICTIMS of the Legal / Judicial and Policing services are familiar with the usual practice of 'editing the transcripts' from recordings made in the course of proceedings at court. The activity / facility care of and subject to the self appointed right of 'judicial chair occupants' to stipulate 'transcript (as) approved by the court', in other words 'ONLY what parts and as edited can be used subsequently'. AND THE STATE is alleged to be part of the principle, "Justice to be seen to be done" (?) (*Link to a typical obstruction relevant to RIGHTS ASSURED under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights)

The image of an oscilloscope tracing, on the right, is of a tape recording that was cut & spliced (physical editing / removal of part of the tape). The activity is evinced at the point where the tracing is flat, as circled. Victims of the criminals who are in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies in the United Kingdom need only to know that the need to cut and remove part of any length of the recording medium, the tape, arises only when 'the editor' desires / wishes to remove material, which in the instance at had was EVIDENCE OF WHAT REALLY WENT ON / WAS SAID at the time of the recording in the court. Removing any part, in order to alter the truth of the matter, that which was recorded initially, leads to the only logical conclusion: 'Tampering with the evidence with intent to alter the truth of the matters recorded'; such activities simply lead to 'indictable offences'. [*Link to a blunt abuse of the courts' facilities when 'two fraudsters club recruits' engaged in a fraudulent court application for costs awards to the other side'].

Recording of court hearing benefits from cosmetic surgery

• We pointed out the above realities to one of the many fraudsters and maintenance engineers who had been introduced to us by the LIPS crowd/mob* (*Known lovers and users of the abused facilities of the courts, for ORGANISED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES founded and resting on blunt and arrogant constructive frauds on the taxpayers, care of legal costs orders by abusers of judicial chair occupation). [*Link to the exclusive page where we reveal the arrangements in place for rampant fraud on the taxpayers and rewards to the victims of the legal circles who agree to keep it all under their hats. Thereafter the corrupted who agree to the reward from plundered funds from the national budget, engage in promotion and new arrogant abuse of the courts facilities, such as they were the victims of to begin with].
• WE did so at the time WHEN we received information that victims of the practices, on attending a court to listen to tape recording of proceedings they were parties to / interested in, discovered that the recording they were allowed to listen to was lacking. Evidently HOURS HAD BEEN CUT OUT / EDITED / CAST INTO OBLIVION.
• Later we were informed that Lord Falconer & the Department for Constitutional Affairs was to direct that ALL CROWN COURT PROCEEDINGS WOULD BE RECORDED IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE.
• And the vile abuser of our time and our readiness to assist / work with victims, enquired if there existed any proof that such activities were ongoing.
• The audacity of the person extended to arrogant threats to the founder of *human-rights* (NGO) Mr Andrew Yiannides, because Mr Yiannides informed the fraudsters club recruit that any 'Statement of Truth / Facts' by Mr Andrew Yiannides, was not to be defective in any way.
• The dreamer was informed that all issues and facts, relevant to the 'scenarios the fraudster had been subjected to, as an alleged victim, had been noted to have been PARTY TO THE ACTIVITIES (through convenient defaults) and had been observed to have been but a participating playmate.
• The arrogant dreamer was informed that ALL RELEVANT MATTERS, especially after a District Judge was noted to have been party to the constructive frauds attached to allegedly legitimate legal costs 'imposed through abuse of judicial chair occupation' and rampant contempt for the evidence / facts relevant to a case before the Employment Tribunal. (*FXXXXXXXXXXX)[*Link from here to the page where we published the whole of 'the approved transcript of the impressive theatrical production intended to lead to the usual cost awrads distribution through participating converts to anfd lovers of the ORGANSIED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. Read it all and NOTE the mentality of selective convivial exchanges with one person wwho wqas attending as an assistant to the 'couple of  and ]
• The dreamer was also informed that A TRANSCRIPT, which the offending District Judge hastened to instigate and authorise without an application for such an instrument GAVE AWAY MUCH MORE THAN THE VILE PARTY TO THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, could ever think of.
• The dreamer was told that the transcript and all relevant legal arguments would be published in the public domain. The need arose to inform the taxpayers and to expose those who are retained and maintained by the state to protect the citizens from criminal activities and criminals. The citizens had to BE MADE AWARE AS TO HOW THE NEED FOR JUSTICE IS ABUSED BY THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS FACILITIES. (*Link to the transcript images & full text in HTML)   

Most victims of the legal system / courts are very familiar with the most common of obstructions to unadulterated justice. We refer to 'the usual practice of failing to provide 'transcripts of hearings' and or, for delaying the making of and the delivery of transcripts', as recklessly intended by public servants and their associates / affiliates in the management of the Enterprises we refer to as 'Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited'(*Fx) (unlimited = no end to the wily & craft-y ways used by the criminals in control in order to impose on the sons of men on planet earth) long existing objectives).

The practices, of course, are but deliberate delaying tactics that are intended to lead to and for use as grounds to reject applications that are set down late, merely and because of the delays in the procurement of the essential transcripts. (*Link to such a scenario)

• Veronica Beryl Foden. She was involved in a number of cases, and her very own, convenient, defaults and omissions in the exercise of her legitimate rights to pass on and receive factual and truthful information was most revealing of her parts as an accomplished lover of 'the constructive frauds through the courts'.
• Attention is drawn to the fact that the case we point to was being treated, by us, as one of the intended Citizen's Alternative Precedent - cases; one of many C.A.P's, it was anticipated. The case was used when challenging the usual 'divorce industry frauds through the courts', in July 2004. Researchers, visitors and readers can *link to the explicit challenges, which we published in our NEWSLETTERS page, for obvious reasons.(Visitors/readers should do well and benefit, if they read all of the Newsletters published in the page).
• However, the managers and controllers of the Litigants (Loonies according to the legal circles) In Person Society, proved to have been nothing else but a bunch of 'sold to the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers', stooges. No wonder the legal circles referred and refer to such persons as loonies.
• Only idiots fall for and in such traps with their eyes open. They shut their ears to the 'considered and reasoned views of others', such as the most obvious of observations: "How can anyone, who recognises, speaks of and even writes about the criminal activities (*Link to an example) in and through the courts expect of and rely on the circles who are in a position to punish them (use the law as Parliament intended) for taking part in such criminal activities?"
• Visitors are urged to read our submissions and the email exchanges with such stooges in explicit and revealing pages. (*Link 1, *Link 2, *Link 3, Link 4, *Link 5).
• Many the PERSONS WHO MADE IT THEIR PRIORITY & BUSINESS to invite and entice every 'other victim of the legal system / circles' whom they contacted and contact or they were/are pointed to, into the world they joined, a world of intrigue, deceptions by the score and rampant fraudulent misrepresentations.
• Such were the scenarios in 1992 when the managers and controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides. It was AFTER he submitted the explicit Appeal that visitors should access in order to acquaint themselves with the material facts pleaded and the violations that were being challenged by 'the targeted non-entity' / 'serf'.(*Link to the exclusive appeal that caused public servants to abandon their plans for the targeted 'serf' / non-entity).
• The dreamers, and 'sold to the system as is' stooges', set out on their journeys of deception and reckless abuse of the assistance and support they benefited from, as covered in our pages.
• Odd it was not, that some charlatans from the UKMM (United Kingdom Men's Movement) also contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides in late April 1998, out of the blue, with a concocted scenario of their own making. [*Link to evidence and proof that 'the managers of the front (UKMM)' apparently benefited from advance of information as to what was on the cards for Mr Andrew Yiannides, the person they targeted].
• They were challenged to explain their unsolicited invitation to Mr Andrew Yiannides, but they failed to comply.
• The simple fact was and remains that ONLY information that others imparted to the controllers / managers of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS) could have been passed on to the UKMM. And between them, such charlatans were making / make it their business to 'mislead the suckers they are pointed to or others sent along to them. The 'others', naturally, being affiliates and partners in deception with fraudulent misrepresentation aplenty, within and by such set-ups. (*Link to a page where the evidence in support of the aforesaid realisations).

In this page we cover the essential need for transcripts of judgements and hearings, especially whenever the need for appeal arises. More often than not such is the case, as arranged / organised by abusers of judicial chair occupation, the directors of the theatrical productions in the courts. Utter disregard of the evidence before their courts and RECKLESS CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAWS (*F2). Laws were/are covered also by Dr. Adoko, a British barrister, who resorted to writing a book 'The Most Corrupt British Judges', when he found himself in the vicious merry-go-round for denial of rights to 'targeted serfs'.

Another typical example of the ploys used by judicial chair occupants, by the clerical staff of the courts AND by 'victims'(?) who join the 'Fraudsters Club', is that of the fraud-of-a-human, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden (VBF). Researchers and visitors can link to the image of a request for an essential transcript of the judgement when Circuit Judge Overend (Exeter - Circuit) was caused to reinstate the action (issued by VBF against the solicitors Wolferstans of Plymouth) that had been stuck out by another abuser of the facilities available to 'court officers'.

WARRANTED, as of April 2003, NOTES:
    (1).  The links above were pointing simply to the page (top) and NOT to any particular element covered at the pages. The objective was simple: "Any genuinely concerned person who had been / was or is a victim of the rampant free-for-all THROUGH THE COURTS (We refer to assaults on the assets and the properties of 'the serfs', the shitizens' and the transfer of such assets as organised & arranged by abusers of the facilities of the courts, to their circles. We hasten to add 'not simply the legal professions').
    (2).  The objective was also a test for any, GENUINELY CONCERNED, challenger. Such persons should be bothered with the revelations pointed to and exposed in our pages. Genuinely concerned and 'law abiding citizens' WOULD BE USING THE ELEMENTS, instead of shoving them 'in the family closet'. Our reference to 'the family' relates to 'the circles from within which such persons were introduced or or sent/send as victims(?) of ongoing abuse of the courts facilities. Such persons came/come along to test our understanding of the workings in the courts and to test our RESOLVE TO EXPOSE THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE IN CONTROL, in pseudo-democracies that allegedly rest and are founded on principles of law and order. We maintain that, at the very least, as tax-payers, one and all would have acted and be seen to BE ACTIVE in challenging the rampant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS. Reference to 'OUR AIMS', that all were/are referred to relate to the activities in and through the courts and cover the facilities available to the genuine victims / challengers. None of the persons we name-to-shame could ever excuse themselves for their evil recklessness and their 'apparent reliance on the criminals in control' to protect them from the obvious: 'the activities we cover and point to in our pages endorsed, approved and used by such stooges and sold to the rampant fraud through the courts activities', charlatans and fraudsters club recruits.
    (3).  The arrangements in place, which we exposed to the world in the exclusive page (*Link to) constituted and happen to be 'the acid test' for and about the victims who came and come along as victims(?) who allege concerns about the problems which they and others face/are facing in and through the courts. Each and every person named in our lists of: (a) Fraudsters Club Recruits,
       (b)   Maintenance Engineers of the system as is,
       (c)   Users of the arrangements in place, for more of the same,
       (d)   Charlatans who are asserting of their own or being promoted by the circles of the Fraudsters Club Recruits could/can never excuse or justify their convenient contempt of the exposed realities which they shoved/shove in the dark corners of their minds. Their perverted views on issues of law and morals, as LOVERS OF THE FACILITIES FOR RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS should be unacceptable to all citizens (who are made aware of the free-for-all facilities through the courts.
    (4).  The element of the charlatans and stooges who were introduced or sent along to test our stance and understanding of the activities and the facilities arranged through the courts WERE THE MAIN CAUSE FOR RESEARCH & INVESTIGATION, for Mr Andrew Yiannides as of 1992. The element and issues surfaced soon after the managers/organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob stated their own plans for the victims of the legal circles/system and THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. Odd it may have been that the founder of human-rights was contacted after the developments on 'The Breeding Grounds - case' [*Link from here to the relevant page] because a flyer for 'The CAMILA Project' was referred(!) to them. They were informed that Mr Andrew Yiannides first got to know of the criminal activities in and through the courts in late 1969 through to 1972 thereafter to discover that abuse of the courts' facilities extended also to the Court of Appeal, as ORGANISED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES].

FOOTNOTES
Introduced in January 2005 eXtra: Visitors / readers should *Link from here to a page where we publish a transcript when a judge was challenged to stand down after the judge threatenerd Mr Andrew Yiannides with a Contempt of Court Order, at a time when THE JUDGE WAS ENGAGED IN ARROGANT CONTEMPT OF THE LAW in a typical conversion of targeted assets scenario; a scenario arrogantly intended to lead to the usual rewards under the table to co-operating 'victims' of the constructive frauds industry operated through the courts, CIUKU Enterprises, style].
    1.    No one? Irrespective of the words of many a dignitary?  *Link from here to the quotes page where we point to realities relevant to THE USE OF THE COURTS in pseudodemocracies for the imposition of undemocratic FRAUDULENT IN INTENT & OFFENSIVE POLICIES that are not part of any approved and elected for, scenarios the 'taxpayers are lumbered with, as in the instance of the proposed Common Market (initially) which state gardually was / is being transformed into a DICTATORSHIP through edicts and directives by / from NON ELECTED persons, some of whom carry with them questionable backgrounds, into their 'public office'.
    2.   *Link from here to the image of the request for an essential transcript WHEN the fraudster was noted to be party to the constructive frauds, because she 'conveniently failed to include the stipulation she specifically was asked to include in 'her request of the court'. The addition at the bottom of the image evinces her deliberate failure to act as she had been 'advised' to do, by Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the founder of *human-rights*; hers and the court's subsequent failures to comply as warranted and laid down by the 'Rules of Procedure', simply added to the obvious: She came along with other scenarios in her brief 'from the LIPS crowd/mob and their mentors/gurus.
    3.   xxx
    4.   xxx
    5.   xxx
    6.   xxx