3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs |
Follow articles by 'Diogenis' at http://www.justiceraped.org and benefit from the realities suppressed for centuries |
Crime - Organised -Institutionalised -
Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial
chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee,
in place but in contempt of all law: |
free4all.htm KEY PageChanges 20 Sep 2003 |
Benefit Fraud - Free For All (Page created July 1999) | |
 JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you
have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with
others against the offenders. Join in a class action.Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action lbduk.org (group) KEY to page
& site A. Page Quotes
- list B. Other
Pages - Quotes Hyperlinked numbers below lead to page material.
Hyperlinked text leads to other material and pages. Page ISSUES
- List Page CHANGES - List |
Site re-construction for better
navigation Page last revised : October 13, 2011VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions. As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@ Facts & Realities. The free for all that the privileged, in the UK benefit from and ENJOY, at the expense of Mr and Mrs Average. Fraudulent conversions through the taxes imposed on the citizens by successive governments. (Access the explicit page(1*) that covers the confidential arrangements between seasoned con artists(2*) who are educated in such matters, in the best education centres in the world'; our law courts. The Tax Payers(15*) who finance the realities we expose, are kept in the dark care of the condescending media barons (3*),who attend secret conspiratorial meetings with self appointed dictators, who have been operating out of alleged democratic states for decades. Below a Government Press Release(Key13) & An Article From the Daily Mail of Tuesday, July 31 2001. Nothing but that which we have been pointing to and drawing the attention of the media and the press barons to. The very facts which many in public office have known of and used for far too long in the execution of undisclosed plans. Only one editor / press baron ever acted on the information we furnished. We published that fact and ever since we have been drawing attention to the editor's conclusion because he confirmed our own observations and findings (4*Link to page). BENEFIT FRAUD FREE-FOR-ALL (We reported it in 1996) Labour's crackdown flops By John Deans - Chief Political Correspondent BENEFIT fraud is continuing to run out of control despite Government pledges to crack down on the problem, official figures reveal. Many local authorities have done little or nothing to stop cheats making bogus claims for housing and council tax benefit, the statistics suggest. Yesterday, the Tories accused Secretary for Work and Pensions Alistair Darling of failing to live up to his pledge to force a more robust strategy on town hall chiefs. In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour claimed that up to £2billion was lost each year in housing benefit fraud and promised to 'start' with a clampdown on phoney claims, followed by persistent action against benefit fraud of all kinds. If Mr Blair had met that pledge, the equivalent of £25 for every person in Britain would have been saved in bogus housing benefit claims alone - enough for a 1p cut in the basic rate of income tax. But while thousands of bogus housing benefit claims are unearthed, thousands more go through unchecked. Following a study of official statistics, Tory welfare spokesman David Willetts suggested yesterday that in 50 per cent of local authorities virtually nothing is being done to tackle the fraud scandal. At least 164 of the 409 authorities in the UK failed to mount a single successful prosecution for fraud. This includes Plymouth, Dover, Dundee, Durham, Barnet, Barnsley, Milton Keynes, Northampton, Harrow, Southampton, Leicester, the Medway towns and Tony Blair's constituency of Sedgefield. (*Link to a revealing case covering 'constructuve fraud activities' at Plymouth). Another 74 have kept no data on the subject, including Barking in East London, Basildon in Essex, Nottingham, Brighton and Hove, Bristol, Burnley and Renfrewshire. Mr Willetts said: `If the record of these councils is the same as for those with data, then 50 per cent of all councils did not successfully prosecute anyone for benefit fraud in the financial year 1999-2000. `A year ago Mr Darling promised to get tough with councils. Twelve months down the line and only one council has been told to improve its performance. This is a scandal.' Announcing his `get tough' campaign a year ago, Mr Darling said if councils failed to tackle fraud, they could expect him to use his powers to direct them to do so. `They have been warned,' he said. A spokesman for Mr Darling said yesterday that 24,000 people were taken to court cautioned or sanctioned as a result of fraud crackdowns last year. The Government claimed to have saved £l00 million after a blitz on fraud and over-payment. But official figures published yesterday said in the year to September 2000, £l.28 billion was still overpaid - eight per cent of the total annual benefit bill. Minister for Work Nick Brown insisted the government was on track to hit its target of a 10 per cent reduction in benefit expenditure related to fraud and error by March. But a document accompanying the figures said: `We cannot be certain the true drop in fraud and error has been as great as 10 per cent but we can be confident that there has been some real drop.' The statistics were based on a sample of 45,000 Income Support claims and 29,000 Job Seeker's Allowance claims from 1.18 million receiving the former and 2.2million collecting the latter. *ENDS* |
For no waffle, for no false accounting (*F2) of the realities behind it all and for no misrepresentations of the facts visit the relevant pages, we link you to, via the text from the Page Quotes List (*A).FOR THE TRUTH AND THE FACTS, as to who and for whom, also on what grounds we determined 'institutionalised fraud and rampant corruption' you need to read the explicit Appeal we publish in our pages (*Link). Conveniently that Appeal was posted late and out of time to co-operating fraudsters, the letting agents who were managing the properties of others, targeted private landlords. The Order Dismissing the Appeal WITHOUT A HEARING, was posted late to persons who were participating in the scams. The order, appealed from, was the result of hijacking and railroading tactics. Nothing but the usual activities from within the courts. It was posted late with intent, in order to create and generate the usual constructive frauds on members of the unsuspecting public, via the Leave to Appeal ploy, instigated by the Court, through the late posting. Rampant fraudulent activities by the experts who know how to manipulate their targeted victims into areas in which their mates, from within the legal circles, thrive. They take for a ride, and to the cleaners, their victims, milking them out of funds as they go along. They do so through abuse of the courts' facilities, care of persons who misconduct in public office. Judicial chair occupants, who allegedly act impartially, take part in the scams and or simply impose the undeclared policies of persons who never put such matters to the electorate care of the condescending media barons and their stooges, the reporters all use / rely upon to misinform the public. Look forward to an exclusive web-site and pages with more evidence about the activities from within the Local Authorities that 'conveniently keep no records'. Their 'organised disorganisation' we have been covering for at least NINE SOLID YEARS NOW. Local Authorities engage in false accounting and their staff are trained to steal Housing Benefit Funds, through misappropriation of funds they handle as Benefit Agents. The said moneys, in law, belong to others; to the providers of the accommodation that is used for persons who enter the country illegally; the illegal migrants that flee to the land of milk and honey, are welcome by local authority specialist trained teams. Then, THEY ARE USED AND TRAINED IN THE CIUKU STANDARDS OF MORALITY THAT ARE INSTIGATED AND PROMOTED THROUGH THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND THE LOCAL COUNTY COURTS! Read the explicit Appeal we publish and consider that a member of the *human-rights.org* Community On Line was treated most abhorrently by the very Local Authority that was using the 'refugees-cum-new British Citizens' in the manner covered in the Appeal. Then consider the letter sent to the Home Secretary on 18th December 1998 and the actions and miracles that materialised thereafter, as reported in the local press. Yes it is all organised, as we publish in our pages, by public servants!For a better understanding and grasp of the above realities *Link to the NATIONAL SCANDAL pages. Use the links provided to visit other relevant pages and documented evidence. (*Link below to an explicit letter / report to the Head Quarters of the Social Security and consider the simplr fact that our alleged servants JUST IGNORED IT ALL being part of the Organised Fraud On The Taxpayers and as the protection racketeers lieutenants).The page covers rampant fraud and corrupt practices. All instigated from within the Local Authorities, Haringey Council, Hackney Council, Enfield Council to name but a few, the latter two relying on the staff and officers of their local county court to endorse, promote and even further enhance the potential for theft of funds and the conversion of properties and assets to the self appointed Lords and Masters of the Serfs upon whom they prey with third parties who operate from within the legal services. Read the explicit Appeal we publish in the pages that cover such activities in the matter of The Housing Benefit Funds And Other Assets Constructive Frauds, part of the thriving CIUKU Enterprises. Visit also other linked pages that cover the FREE FOR ALL activities from within local authorities and the local county courts. The Authorities are not helpless. All have their fingers in the honey-pot. An old proverb points to the fact that: "The Fish Always Begins To Rot In The Head - First". Read all about the facts that FORGERIES WERE / ARE USED AND PROMOTED BY HARINGEY COUNCIL STAFF and the co-operating in the scams Letting Agents. They indulge freely and target properties and individuals FOR thefts of Housing Benefit and blunt conversions of the misappropriated rents that are owing to the owners of the properties targeted, to illicit legal costs orders. Such abuse of the courts' facilities leading to repossession / enforced sales of the targeted properties. The police, on the payroll of the Local Authority, NOT CONTENT SIMPLY TO DEFAULT TO PROSECUTE ANY OF THE CULPRITS, but they actually, wilfully and with intent furnished false information to another government institution, in order to cause additional damages to the targeted victims of crime. The evidence exists and it will be published. The Police as beneficiaries (their salaries/wages part of the stolen and misappropriated funds - the Housing Benefit secured from central government for the occupation of the properties of others know not of the provisions of Parliament. The theft Acts and or the law on FORGERIES AND FALSE INSTRUMENTS, such as the illicit costs and other county court orders THAT LACK ACCOUNTABILITY BY THE AUTHORS, are published in invisible ink, as far as the police, the beneficiaries from the proceeds of criminal activities, are concerned. The citizens foot the bill for the salaries and the wages of the reckless in order for the allegedly incompetent and the CRIMINALLY MOTIVATED, who are retained and maintained on our behalf as alleged public servants, TO BENEFIT FROM THEFT of moneys, properties AND THEFT OF THE CITIZENS RIGHTS TO PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW! If you know of any victims, who suffered theft of Housing Benefit for which the local authority staff and officers were responsible, for such IMPOSED DAMAGES THROUGH ABUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE, draw their attention to the pages we point to at *human-rights* or tell them to get in touch with: *** violations@human-rights.demon.co.uk *** Feel free to circulate this to any others you consider to be interested, either as victims and or as persons who are engaged in challenging any kind of wrongs the persons suffered because of defaults and omissions by the police and or deliberate acts/omissions amounting to abuse of public office from persons retained in the Law Enforcement Agencies, police and judiciary. Contact *human-rights* directly if you have been the victim of FALSE INSTRUMENTS or downright FORGERIES. For clarification access the page 'The LAW' - there are plenty of links at the *human-rights* web-site. Join a group we are putting together for a simple demand that: "The offenders do receive the same attention under 'The LAW' as Lord J. Archer. MOST IMPORTANT, a CLAIM IN TORT (class action) CAN BE FORMULATED UNDER EUROPEAN UNION LAW. Forget the usual rubbish about Crown proceedings. Read what the Executive (Government that creates law for the protectiond of the citrizens from crime and criminals) and the Administrative (The Police and Judiciary who are retained to apply the law to known / established practices and events). Read of the facility in place by fraudsters who apparently are alowed to act as absolute dictators in our allegedly civilised democracy. The arrogance of judicial chair occupants exists only care of our representatives in government. (*Link to the evidence, proof of the arrogance of judicial chair occupants).We are no longer serfs of the Middle Ages and public servants, retained on our behalf to protect us, cannot act as arrogantly as they have been doing for centuries. "The Law is a ass" (asserted, Charles Dickens) and "First we kill the lawyers" (opined William Shakespeare) and such views were not born of fickle minds. DO NOTE that breaches of European Union Law are torts in law and under such provisions, victims can and should act jointly. For more information and facts in law, the boffins ignore and shove
under their carpets / in their family closets, do contact *human-rights* directly. You
will be pointed to material published at *human-rights* for clarification. 11 May 1998 DSS - Room 2C10 Our Ref. 11MHBOCF OPEN LETTER
Dear Sir/Madam The document was transmitted to the office of the Rt. Honourable Prime Minister before transmitting same to Max Clifford Associates because of the gravity of the situation. In the last four weeks I have come across more evidence as to the practices indulged into by staff at the Benefits Section in Haringey Council and I submit the following documented evidence: - 1. Communication dated 19.12.97 from Benefits Agency to Mr T Hadjoudj, evincing ‘the submission of an out of date tenancy agreement’. 2. Copy of part of the out of the outdated (4/8/94) 6 month tenancy agreement evincing rent set @ £220pw used and relied upon for over 3 years by claimant and council staff. 3. THE actual agreement, both tenant and HOUSING BENEFIT staff at Haringey Council, OUGHT TO HAVE SUBMITTED to the Benefits Agency evincing agreed rent @ £180pw as of 27 October 1997. The fact is that staff at Haringey Council were using and relying on the initial £220pw agreement for well over three years, and in the meantime the landlord was not even receiving rents from Bell Estates under various pretexts. In the instance at hand the staff of the Local Authority (Haringey Council) had been remitting £165 per week to the ‘claimant’. BUT, with intent, the very staff adamantly refused to give any information to the Landlord and or his agent. Through defaults the staff of the Council encouraged deception by the tenant/claimant on the landlord in the sum of £20 per week because the tenant was pleading over a long period that only £145pw was remitted to him by the Social Security. You must admit that the use of the original agreement and not the subsequent, dated 27 October 1997, is highly questionable and was unjustified. Seeking assistance/benefit at higher levels (council and claimant) while remitting a lot less to the provider was and remains the most common practice. Staff of the very council had declared a rent set at £107.50pw for premises for which the rent officer had previously set a higher rent for other occupants. MONTHS later the staff were ‘cornered’ and they disclosed rent set @£120pw. Thereafter remitting £12.50pw to a rogue letting agent LONG AFTER the agent was no longer acting for the landlord AND WITHIN KNOWLEDGE OF THE COUNCIL STAFF THET THE rogue letting agent WAS DISMISSED AND HAD BEEN THROWN OUT OF A COURT CLAIM BY A COUNTY COURT JUDGE. The practice of seeking/setting and securing higher rents from Central Government, than what councils are remitting to landlords/property owners is the most common of the offences. The double and triple tier is the cornerstone of creative accountancy and intentionally confusing documentation by council staff and co-operating rogue letting agents. One sum is claimed and set for a claim by the council, another sum is reported and remitted to the tenant/claimant and yet another sum is eventually remitted to the landlords / owners of the let properties. IF the landlords are to receive less, eventually, than Central Government meets for a claim WHY the cuts for others in the process? WHY NOT inform the landlords directly what they are to receive from Central Government for any given property? Millions can be saved by cutting out the ‘self-help’ dishonest kickbacks by the organisers, who use all manner of deceit and devious devices to suppress the facts which others, the police, in charge of investigating such crimes (constructive frauds / deceptions / misappropriation of funds etc.) do not concern themselves with. In order to bring the message home I submit also two additional copy documents from the Hadjoudj case: -
We do not have to elaborate on the relevant statutory provisions and Sections of the Theft and Counterfeit Acts of Parliament. We do not have to refer you to the Social Security Administration (Fraud) Act 1997. One need be no Einstein or a genius to recognise CORRUPT PRACTICES. The landlord signed a Section 9 Statement clearly qualifying the fact that the letter allegedly from him to the tenant IS A FORGERY. Anyone, with common sense, can understand why, the forgery was introduced by the council staff who, then failed to refer the Section 9 Statement to the police. The Letting / Managing Agents of the property, the council’s partners in deception and dishonest handling of funds belonging to others, similarly defaulted. They also failed to deliver copies of the Section 9 Statement to the police. The COUNCIL STAFF AND OFFICERS refused to and failed to deliver copies of the alleged letter from the landlord to the tenant, particularly to the alleged author, the private landlord. In the premises because of the blunt deceptions and the fraudulent misrepresentations to the DSS, we are reporting to you the aforementioned Crimes fully intending to exercise our rights in national and international law. As our adopted policy, we shall be EXPOSING AND WE WILL BE DEALING WITH THE RAMPANT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION that the council staff indulge in, as a matter of public/official policy. Public servants, and their partners in deceptions, do so at the expense of ordinary citizens who spent a lifetime of honest hard work through which to secure and create an investment, their residential property. The elderly and the retired are the targeted victims, of the practices. They are the most vulnerable who live in fear of the other area of rampant deception and fraud, the legal circles and system as managed by the operatives, those who are in charge and control of our courts, the court and the legal services. We look to you for an acknowledgement and response proper. We expect and demand that at the very least you will be referring the issues to Central Government and that we be informed accordingly. You have sufficient information from which to proceed with an official investigation at high level, such as the Public Auditors called in and or in the alternative to inform us that you have referred to issues to the Serious Fraud Office. We need only refer you to the directions of the Prime Minister to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field to "Do the unthinkable" in order to bring down the high level of fraud on the Social security Budget. YOU SHOULD, THEREFORE, ACT ACCORDINGLY if we are not to surmise that the rampant Housing Benefit Fraud is not simply an issue of organised and institutionalised fraud on the public – CORRUPTION on an unprecedented scale as a matter of PUBLIC POLICY, because of ‘the government’s commitments in other areas’ Sincerely Andrew Yiannides ENCL. Copies as text. FOOTNOTE:- Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob]. 1. xxx |
