h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

[*Link from here for an introduction to the founder's tribulations in 1972-75]

And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here

*Link from here to an explicit affidavit submitted in support of the challenges born of and attached to the abuse of the Housing Benefit funds through the Local Authorities, such as Haringey, Enfield, Hackney, etc.

*Link also from here to the evidence qualifying the fact that VICTIMS OF THE ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD INSTIGATED BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES (ongoing through abuse of the courts facilities, 'the staff and officers of which, endorse it all) FALL FOR THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE AND AGREE TO KEEP THE REWARDS from plundered taxpayers' contributions, UNDER THEIR HATS.

*Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised while Members of Parliament were -as they still are- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:- 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite; none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM. HE ACTUALLY SPOKE OF FALSE RECORDS / ABOUT A FORGERY advanced and promoted by the legal circles when the Commissioner was delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1976. He spoke of such activities, criminal acts by solicitors some 15 months after he received a true copy of THE FORGERY that was created and promoted by the licensed criminals for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes' to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, >a typical PSEUDOdemocracy<.

Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION OF THE SOLICITORS & THE BARRISTERS in 1972?

*Link from here to developments in 2010 >COMMITMENTS - UNDERTAKINGS - PROMISES< as recorded in an interview to 'COUNSEL' by Attorney General, Dominic Grieve.
With such facilities in place (the words we point to here) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts?
ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm [*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise
On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE, on record since 1940 and revealed deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other
IN THE MEANTIME WE have been naming and shaming a number who know of & do much more than just approve wrongs imposed on millions of 'sucker-serfs' in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union that allegedly protects 'citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION.
Needless to say the case we refer to above entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies]

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals]
Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *
family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS
[*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family]

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.
An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police [*L],
          one to solicitors [*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES (Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES >>as of October 2011 access an explicit FAX received by lovers / promoters operating out of false fronts<<]

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1972 which the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

Follow articles by 'Diogenis' at http://www.justiceraped.org and benefit from the realities suppressed for centuries.

 

forgeries.htm      KEY

 Forgeries - their tools Page first published, February 1997
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in a class action.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action lbduk.org (group)

KEY To Page & Site
Forgeries Used Forgeries Relied Upon
Forgereies Introduced
Forgereies Promoted Forgeries Ignored
Court of Appeal Forgery  7.
8.
9.
10. 
11.
12.

Forgeries Introduced
1. By Solicitors
2. By Building Society
3. By Bank
4. By Police
5. By Local AuthorityStaff
6. By Barristers
7. By Judges-False Orders
8. e21
9. In Divorce Proceedings
10. x

Forgeries Used
1. By Solicitors
2. By Building Society
3. By Baristers
2. By Police
3. By Judges / endorsed
4. Police Defaults Endorse
5. Barristers Endorsed
6. In High Court Fraud
7. To Inflate  Interest          
8. x
9. x
10. x

Forgeries Relied Upon
1. By Solicitors
2. By Barristers
3. By Pollice
2. Judges& CrocodileVictim
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6
2. s
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6

Forgereies Promoted 
!. part 5
2. By Barristers
3. By Judges
4. By Police
5. Council Staff & Officers
part 6
part 6
part 6
part 6
part 6

Forgeries Endorsed
1. By Solicitors
2. By Baristers
3. By Pollice
2. By Judges
3. e
part 5
part 6
2. s
3. s
4. ce
part 5
part 6

Forgeries Ignored
1. By Police
2. By Judges
3. By MANY Solicitors
4. 'Victim's Many Defaults
5. part 5
part 6
2. s
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6


Page - Quotes
1. Income generation for the circles from which they arose to public office.
2. s
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6
2. s
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6
2. s
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6
2. s
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6
2. s
3. s
4. e
part 5
part 6
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page last Revised : October 13, 2011
Site re-construction for better navigation & access to infotrmation

THE ISSUE OF FORGERIES
(used freely by solicitors in court proceedings)
Citizens come forward with evidence that FORGERIES were/are used and introduced in court proceedings. Our Law Enforcement Agencies ignore and or endorse such activities for and in the interest of criminals who are seen to benefit.  Solicitors and barristers always promoters and accessories during and or after the introduction of the FORGERIES, and or as aidors and abettors thereafter. All are JUST AS GUILTY of the offence as the instigators. The judges, in each and every instance (we report and publish) simply rewarding the legal circles for and because of their joint intended purposes that any diligent citizen can adduce from:
1. The facts attached to the use of forgeries for the transfer, relate to theft, to misappropriation and the distribution / dissemination of Housing Benefit funds, as clear as can be. Many the examples, and typical the practices such as the FORGERIES PROMOTED and used (if not instigated) by the promoters, alleged servants of the public who were operating out of the confines of Haringey Council (as out of other Local Authority Services too). Arrogant and blunt abuse of public facilities FOR THE INSTITUTIONALISED FRAUDULENT CONVERSION of the targeted funds as organised by the staff and officers, of Haringey Council, in North London.
2. Forgeries introduced, used, relied upon* [*Link from here to the page where we publish in the left margin column THREE COPIES of forgeries -all endorsed with a clone of the same copy-signature and wake up sucker-serfs] and promoted by 'the protected who are assured of the said protection by abusers of judicial chair occupation* [*Link from here to proof]. And the police defaulting with intent to prosecute the criminals as in other Housing Benefit, fraud, deception, dishonest handling, THEFT OF and fraudulent misappropriation of Housing Benefit Funds, received from Central Government for the occupation of the properties of persons who retired overseas. The benefit claimed by and on behalf of the intended beneficiaries : 'the created refugees, rushing to the land of milk of honey'; all and everything, care of the orchestrated scenarios intended to lead to the flood of refugees / asylum seekers. In short 'the contibutions of the taxpayers >to the Treasury< through the orchestarted scenarios STOLEN & MISAPPROPRIATE by the creators and operatives of CIUKU Enterprises, at we cover in our pages.

3.

 The depositions and statements of Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven, cover issues of FORGERIES to which he refers as MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST.

4.

 False instruments - COURT ORDERS issued and introduced without hearings, without reference to the evidence in court files and IN CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAWS simply intended to lead to the need for Appeals. Blunt abuse of the court' facilities by public servants. Reference to such instruments in the APPEAL we publish as called for and warranted in the National Scandal - pages. Fraudulent conversion of Housing Benefit funds as Haringey Council staff and officers engaged in through reliance on 'the relevant county court' stated and pleaded on the succinct appeal.  
The Legal and Judicial circles do indulge in the creation and use of false instruments, and they blatantly and arrogantly endorse or entertain FORGERIES by turning a blind eye to the criminal activities solicitors and barristers indulge in. One and all, within the legal system, indulge unchallenged, care of and through abuse of the much revered and relentlessly promoted 'independence of the judiciary'. Through such activities the conversion of assets industry controlled by absolute Lords and Masters in charge of our legal system / the Legal Systems and the courts within all PSEUDOdemocracies. The judges acting injudiciously in their judicial chairs, while the investigative branch of the law* doing nothing, for years, as can be noted in the Haringey & Other Councils Housing Benefits 'ORGANISED Fraud on the National Budget- The National Scandal. All, and everything, because of the undisclosed to the electorates (of a number of countries) arrangements, to impose on the sucker-serfs the long standing plans of fraudsters / criminals 'to create the new 'tribes of Israel' as written of and about by the creators, the successors, the followers and the impostors who follow the plans of the creators of the most vile of works, ever to have been misrepresented to mankind'. We refer to the Old Testament, from which some of the vile scenarios, attributed to the alleged creatoir of all and everything Andrew Yiannides has reporiduced and points to at http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org/intro.htm [*L]
FORGERIES* as blatant as the forgeries our founder was the victim of over a quarter of a century ago, ignored by the police and the Courts. Such instruments never referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions by any party from within the Law Enforcement Agencies. All the while solicitors and barristers silver lining their pockets through alleged civil proceedings proper and as the offenders in charge of CIUKU Enterprises* [*Link] determine. At least one solicitor, on OATH declared the SPECIFIC (document) INSTRUMENT precisely what it was (link next line). Simply, A BLATANT FORGERY.  By definition in law it was nothing else*; it did not exist at the time of the events that gave rise to the High Court action. THREE years later it was 'procured' but the criminals made a mistake, and 'their instrument' was endorsed with a date as of the year of the High Court writ and not as of the year of the events that lead to the issue of the Writ. The date on THE INSTRUMENT, thereafter was AMENDED to the previous year, the year of the events. That amendment and the simple fact as to WHY it was 'procured', USED and relied upon by the legal experts established INTENT TO DEFRAUD, and or to prejudice the proceedings through deception and use of the instrument. The Metropolitan Police in that instance were handed also court documents seen to be blatant FORGERIES intended to defraud the targeted victim, but in typical 'operations tactics' the police simply shoved the instruments in their 'collection box'.
Thereafter, the police themselves, accessories and abettors after the fact; just as the 'judicial persons' sitting in their chairs turning a blind eye to the obvious, the amendment on the document before them; an instrument, which in any event the fraudsters had admitted in letters AT THE TIME OF THE EVENTS (that lead to the institution of proceedings) DID NOT EXIST, created over two and half years later and when the error of
In the above stated case, as in many others and the Haringey Council Conversion of Housing Benefit funds case, THE METROPOLITAN POLICE defaulting to act as the law provides. The victims of the practices at Haringey fully aware of the fact that the police receive their salaries from the offenders who are in charge of the creative accountancy practices within Haringey Council.
British Justice, BLIND DEAF AND DUMB* declared the Daily Mirror on 12 May 1992. Deaf to the statements of at least one of the solicitors who declared on affidavit the fact that the INSTRUMENT born years later, indeed WAS a forgery (a false instrument made falser after changing the date also). All legal 'experts' were incapable of referring A BLATANT CRIMINAL activity (intended to mislead and to defraud) to the Director of Public Prosecutions. It was only natural, of course, because THEY WERE ALL UP TO THEIR NECKS IN FRAUDULENT COURT PROCEEDINGS. And those who rose to public office, sitting in 'judicial chairs', KNEW IT. As promoters of 'strokes of genius' in legal practice they ignored 'The LAW' and or treated it as non-existent for the purposes of those who were in charge of and 'controlling the proceedings'. Reference to the National Scandal practices qualifies, clarifies and quantifies who the controllers always are, and who the beneficiaries; the serfs always the victims.
Why should ANYONE from within the legal circles refer THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES of their colleagues in arms to the authoroties? The legal professions!  The relevant Public servants who should AND MUST PROSECUTE them, even now, because CRIME is not statute barred, acting as blind, as deaf and as dumb  asw ever. All busy milking the cow; their intended victims; the litigants; at least one of them because the beneficiary of the FRAUD in the course of alleged legitimate legal proceedings could OUTLAST FINANCIALLY the intended victim of all. Simply put, constructive frauds THROUGH FRAUDULENT COURT PROCEEDINGS. Criminals seen to be BUYING CORRUPTED JUSTICE through the corrupt and the corrupted, CARE OF THE CORRUPTERS.
And the solicitors who actually procured and PROMOTED THE FORGERY dared declare their  intentions on affidavit through 'a blatant invitation to a judge'. Thus confirming the adage "... the law grinds the poor(er) to a halt ...."  and  we add "....or to an early grave, as many victims of the violations of sections 134, 135, 136 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, inevitably do".  The Law Enforcement Agencies indulge in crime, as protected species. Those who rose to judicial office care not about Parliament's Laws! When a solicitor admits and pleads on affidavit A CRIMINAL OFFENCE and neither he, nor the judicial chair occupants, as directors of and promoters engaging in constructive frauds through abuse of public office IGNORE THE LAW what you have is Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited in the making; that much our founder recognised in 1972 when he was handed a blatant forgery by his 'school friend' and at the time 'trusted solicitor'. Constructive frauds through the "Need to revert to court on these issues" as the criminals in charge of the legal system intent, for thus they benefit from the extended facilities and the 'invisible services' they offer to and provide for one another. The very criminal activities, albeit documented, ignored by the police. Thus one recognises the principles upon which our blind, deaf and dumb directors and actors found their services and operations. CRIME, unashamed, blunt! 
Our courts are simply there to create conditions through which to generate income for the circles* from within which our judges rise to become 'judicial chair occupants'. Most certainly very few can be seen to be judicious and or respectful of 'The LAW'. The C.o.A ruling and the 'directions -below- on the occasion of the injunction application in "The Downing Street Years"* case established that issue in the most profound manner.  We repeat our observation and FAIR comments below; we are entitled to such under International Law; never mind the authority of the 'demigods' sitting in their justice halls and theatres the cost of which is met by the revenue providers along with their fat salaries.

A classic and typical example of abuse of judicial chair occupation
and
arrogant misconduct in public office. 

An application by "The Sunday Times" for an injunction because of the threatened copyright infringements in respect of "The Downing Street Years" book.  On dismissing the application the C.o.A ruled: "We could not grant to you what we would not to the needy and the poor....... This is the wrong application...... Let them (the Mirror newspaper) publish (copy from the book) AND THEN institute proceedings for damages..."  Pure, unadulterated constructive frauds on the persons seeking a simple court order in order to block COPYRIGHT infringement.  A 'serf' copies a video film and his equipment gets confiscated, is ordered to pay damages and even goes to prison BUT when a conglomerate business the same Law does not exist!  Want to know why?  No, the serfs need no help; the answer IS simple; there is PLENTY THERE for conversion to legal costs for theatrical productions through scripts galore.
WE all know how the CoA proposed scenario and cases are conducted and how long they take! HOW DOES ONE ESTIMATE OR QUANTIFY DAMAGES IN SUCH AN INSTANCE? Better still HOW MUCH DO LEGAL BOFFINS MAKE OUT OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS?*  ("Best theatre I have been to..." (court)  Richard Branson after the Camelot, libel/slander action).

*

 Link from here to the announcement, as of the creation of this website, in February 1997. We point there to the fact that the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, DID BENEFIT FROM AN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE from the Leader of the Opposition (at the time) Tony Blair QC. As of then -the first week of July 1995- many the alleged victim-challengers who were made aware of the content of the response. We are to release the letter sent in response to substantial ongoing submissions to the leader of the Opposition, to the Prime Minister of the day as of days when the legal circles indulged in the promotion of a false instrument that was created and subsequently FORGED TOO, after the creators of the FALSE INSTRUMENT discovered that the mastermind behind the created false instrument endorsed it with the wrong year.  

Updated: October 13, 2011

 
FOOTNOTE:-
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
   1.  xxx
   2.  xxx
   3.  xxx
Link to:  Matter of Public Interest   Forgeries
Link to:  Judicial Independence   Definition in LAW  Justice Blind, Deaf and Dumb
Link to: CAP's HomePage  human-rights Downing Street  The LA

Back to HomePage

 

New page released in October 2011 resting on a FAX many fraudsters-club-recruits received in 1999 >IMPORTANT WARNING / HINT <Access www.justiceraped.org & follow the articles by Diogenis searching for 'humans' >THINKERS< 2400 years on

APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides used to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers of abused public services in allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.
The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.
HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com system THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were ignored.
Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com
In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.
EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.
Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is
.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegedly reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s). 

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment&Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
NOTE: The human rights Community on Line facility is no longer available by NorthSky.Com because the owner of the domain >human-rights.org< took steps to put an end to the abuse of the trust the officers and the staff of NorthSky.Com engaged in, in breach of the corporation's agreement with Andrew Yiannides the owner of the domain and the person whose concept was put to all victims of the abused courts facilities as far back as 1997 when the need to produce video documentaries for submissions to the media was also acted upon, by the proponent, Andrew Yiannides. Andrew acted after the managers/controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob endorsed the proposition. However, the allegedly concerned 'organisers of the LIPS mob, failed to co-operate and act as their false tongues allegedly endorsed. ALL victims of abused public facilities, especially the courts services should access [*Link] the page where we publish evidence most relevant in the SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH & REALITIES from the taxpayers.
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster

Last modified: October 13, 2011