This web-site is dedicated
to the memory of the niece of our founder, Harita (Ritou) S Englezakis, a fine young lady
who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel
attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that
life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves
for the operatives through ILL (they do make one sick, literally & physically) legal
services : care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. (Access mother's
web-site...mother's site)
SIX months before taking her own life
that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :-
"I can't understand it uncle
everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE". |
background.htm
Page Revised: October 13, 2011
Andrew and THE BACKGROUND to it
all |
Andrew is a British citizen of colonial extraction; born in Nicosia Cyprus;
educated at the English School Nicosia. Throughout his secondary
education he learned of, admired and respected the much publicised and proclaimed virtues
of the British Democratic System and the world famous attributes of British Fair Play.
Such teachings and practices were part of school life; particularly in the numerous sports
activities where one was taught to be a fair sport and a true Brit, never to kick someone
when down and or hit below the belt. But those were the teachings, the proclamations and
the practices in a colonial environment. Not so life in the U.K.
Since 1956 Andrew has lived in London. Over
that span of time he has observed and lived through a gradual deterioration of morals and
civility in the United Kingdom; all is beyond recognition with no respect for
family let alone neighbour or other citizens. Not that life in London ever
matched the civilities and manners instilled in Andrew through his upbringing and his
social and spiritual background; also through the teachings at a fine educational
establishment. Over 50 years of life in London, a city that has gradually become a true
European cosmopolis, Andrew can state that only on one single instance the Law Enforcement
Agencies truly applied themselves to the law as the law provides without bias, favouritism
and or prejudice and discrimination. On that single instance the detective constable, who
was assigned to the case, was of Afro-Caribbean origins and the criminal was of Far
Eastern origins. On every other occasion and instance the police defaulted to act and/or
to exercise their public duties as the law provided. The events depicted in "The
Breeding Grounds - case" [*Link]. can safely be treated as a typical example of the practices and
the failings of both Law Enforcement Agencies. The operations of the system have gradually
been demoralising the country and its population; the citizens reverting a ones proud
respected and much admired nation into free individuals with no respect for any law,
society and or any other but one's self; leading to and creating new jungle rules because
the person with no respect for any law and or any other citizens is protected while the
victims are scorned and abandoned by a great nation and a self proclaimed democratic
modern civilisation. In a true Democracy, however, the
freedoms of the individual should not be through impositions and or the deprivation of the
rights of other citizens.
The public at large
can draw its own conclusions as to 'the system' and the operations of the Law Enforcement
Agencies maintained by the United Kingdom. When individuals, who know of and are
charged to apply the law, flagrantly breach it in order to offer protection to
others who have themselves breached national laws (of which they are and should be fully
aware) why should the ordinary citizen himself act any different? When ministers in
charge of the police and the Judiciary are 'conveniently protected' by their subordinates,
because they elect to cover up complaints directed at and raised with the Ministers
themselves, through suppression of the facts and or through incompetent responses* the
final question is "WHO governs? And How?"
Is the answer :
" Through Juniors and Dereliction of Public Duty ? "
Read "The Breeding Grounds -
case*"; download and print it, if you wish to use it as a C.A.P case. In that case because the
police failed to take the necessary steps, called for from the onset, THEY SIMPLY promoted
and encouraged crime. Through their defaults they ALSO simply promoted and
encouraged the problems and AS always INTENDED the services of the legal circles to which
one and ALL have close affinity. The first young constable ignored the victim and in true
Metropolitan Police practice HE simply wished to generate work and income for
solicitors'*; a very common direction by public servants.* The young
constable determined that threats to property and life, violence, blackmail and
intimidation were just civil matters. In ordering the victim to spend funds with
solicitors the constable just exhibited the malaise from within the LAW enforcement
agencies. In the UK the law exists ONLY WHEN YOU CAN AFFORD TO BUY your rights,
unless some other can outbid you through the manipulations of the legal system the
operatives from within offer to the highest bidder. The UK is, after all, an alleged
Democracy where CAPITAL and money ARE THE ONLY COMMODITIES that count.
Humans are simply vehicles to be used by manipulative public servants and the dishonest
and the criminally orientated and or motivated. Those who ARE ENCOURAGED by the state
and public servants, especially from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, to feel free and
to act as they please, at the expense of others.
Read the letter from an illiterate*
in English, in law and in court practice, member of staff from within the Lord
Chancellor's department. Draw your own conclusions. WHO, from within the
United Kingdom, care to apply themselves to the Laws of Parliament?
Consider carefully the CoA ruling and our
comments in respect of 'The Downing Street Years'*. That august body, through
blatant defaults to consider the law applicable in the case before them, elected instead
to OFFER the usual service to the circles from within which they arose to public (judicial
- most certainly but not judicious) office. Nothing but the usual from within the confines
of UK courts. Denial of rights in law to THE CITIZENS and promotion of the cancerous
growth industry (legal services) care of the merchants of misery (lawyers). |
| Link to: |
The CAMILA Project (concept 1981) Aims and Areas of Complaints /
List and links to relevant material, web-pages and affiliated web-sites |
| Link to: |
The Breeding Grounds - case the police, the
county court, the Lord Chancellor and his office, the Home Office, the Commission for
Racial Equality ALL engaging in contempt for the law and the rights allegedly assured to
ALL citizens(!) in a pseudo-democracy. Crime IMPOSED & ENDORSED by public servants,
collectively on 'the serfs' in allegedly civilised states as organised by the
master-craftsmen of the biggest and longest ongoing fraud on planet earth. Read the
explicit appeal where the link takes readers and recognise why the offending abusers of
public office ABANDONED THEIR PLANS FOR THE TARGETED SERF. Another appeal and the
challenges 'thrown to an agent of the Lord Chancellor lead to the announcement of the Bill
of Rights. In the meantime 'fraudsters club recruits' carried and carry on ignoring such
positive results and simply aim for more of the same while promoting all manner of
misrepresentations and FRAUDULENT IN INTENT ASSERTIONS to the victims they are pointed to
or contact them care of the promotions the fraudsters club recruits benefit via the
media's Intellectual Prostitutes. |
| Link to: |
The Downing Street Years - case fair comment
warranted AFTER the Court of Appeal exhibited its real role in an allegedly civilised
pseudo-democracy where the courts are used in order to impose FRAUDULENTLY CREATED
PECUNIARY ADVANTAGE TO THOSE from whose ranks the judiciary arise to public office as
alleged judicious persons, serving the citizens through their presumed knowledge and
RESPECT FOR THE LAW. A simple observation & REALITIES for students of law and the
victims of the legal circles, the courts and all other public servants. [Refer to the
words we point to at the top of most pages at this site - *Link]
|
| Link to: |
Letter from an illiterate public servant;
marvel at the fraudulent representations by an alleged servant of the public who either
knew not of the law or he was simply acting as an automaton, a programmed robot that could
only forward a response from and on behalf of the Lord Chancellor as an illiterate in
English, let alone the provisions of Law that applied in the matters related to.....
decide for yourself reader: Was the person a robot or a moron? |
| Link to: |
Juniors and Dereliction of Public Duty |
| Link to: |
The Confidential Fraud we expose
exclusively, as the most offensive of fraud on the tax payers. Arrogantly organised
constructive FRAUDS (plural intended) with the blessings of the police, Ministers, Media
Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain in order to peddle and
spread falsehood after falsehood in the longest running of frauds on humanity, the sons of
men, the naive and gullible who are conditioned to act and behave like the 'fraudsters
club recruits we are naming and exposing in our pages. |
| Link to: |
The
website which Andrew Yiannides, the founder of
human-rights, created as part of Andrew's undertakings to his late mother, the
widow Harita Kyriakou Tjirkalli-Ioannidou, born at Karavas, Kyrenia District,
Cyprus. Note the element of reliance by Andrew's two younger brothers and his elder
sister, on the fraud of an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Supreme Court (Mr. Kypros
Nicholas) who, all three knew and were fully aware of the fact that he had
engaged in criminal activities (many years earlier) in order to impose on their brother,
Andrew, extensive damages through the New World Order Code of Morals and Ethics. All three
were more than familiar with the results of the constructively engineered fraudulent court
proceedings that included a BLUNT FORGERY and a number of false instruments. Everything
had been instigated by the legal circles and was processed from within the confines of the
Royal Courts of Justice; all was processed and executed care of the very solicitor and his
fraternal brethren, the secretive Freemasons operating within the courts and most public
services, within the United Kingdom, in other PSEUDOdemocracies and many an International
Organisation. All three, Maria, Costas and Savvas simply relied on the very fraudster, the
licensed by the Law Society, Kypros Nicholas, to impose (as on their brother Andrew, years
earlier) on their mother, on their sister Despina Englezajkis and on their brother Andreas
(Andrew Yiannides) new constructively engineered damages intended (by the criminal the
three were relying upon) to lead to the created states which followers of the teachings by
examples stated in the Old Testament systematically imposed on the United Kingdom's
sucker-serfs who have taxes imposed on them fort the maintenance of criminals in public
office. We refer to 'the different tongues scenario' which Andrew copied from the Old
Testement in the page linked to from here. We hasten
to point out that the very element (the creation of the different tongues scenario = the
conflicting / different interests, created, resting and founded on criminal activities)
are imposed on the sucker-serfs care of the contemptuous of the law practices the
solicitor Kypros Nicholas had been party to years earlier. HE, Kypros Nicholas, SET ABOUT
PROMOTING THE BLUNT FORGERY (true copy can be linked to from
here) as an accomplished FRAUD of an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Supreme
Court, as just another TYPICAL SOLICITOR, LICENSED TO INDULGE IN FRAUD APLENTY, THROUGH
BREACHES OF TRUST AND CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, which followers of the New World Order Code of
Morals and Ethics CREATE & ENTERTAIN relentlessly. |
| Link to: |
The
challenges [page 23 image] submitted to a County Court, after the maligned fraudsters who
relied on the solicitor referred to above, also other abusers of public office to create
new avenues through false instruments aplenty, such as the allegedly legitimate legal
costs orders which the two Justices at the Court of Appeal, Orr and Buckley as licensed by
the state fraudsters imposed on the victim of commercial fraud and the costs of the
constructively engineered fraudulent court activities all indulged in, IN CONTEMPT of
the House of Lords Ruling linked to from here. One and
all simply relying on the police NOT TO PROSECUTE THEM FOR CREATING AND INTRODUCING THE
BLUNT FORGERY WHICH FORGERY THE TWO FRAUDSTERS Orr & Buckley (Justices) recklessly
elected to ignore through blunt abuse of public office and ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR THE LAW,
just like the police, indulged after the solicitors and the Barristers / Counsel endorsed
the FORGERY [*Linked to from here]
as allegedly legitimate evidence in support of the defence 'the legal boffins' settled and
submitted to Court for and on behalf of their client, the Defendants. |
FOOTNOTE:-
Footnote eXtra:
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE
RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office,
especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be
delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published
in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary
in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage
and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
1.
xxx |
Return To HomePage |
|
